Conceptly
LessonsFormulasPricing
Sign inStart free
Conceptly
TermsPrivacyRefunds
© 2026 · Physics for everyone
  1. Home
  2. Lessons
  3. Mechanics
  4. Moments & Equilibrium: the Non-Uniform Beam
All lessons Mechanics24 min

Moments & Equilibrium: the Non-Uniform Beam

Complete each stage to unlock the next one.

← The Principle of MomentsEquilibrium: Ladders & Hinged Beams →
01
Hook
02
Explore
03
Formalize
04
Practice
05
Challenge
Interactive simulation
01

Hook

A 4 m plank rests on two supports. It weighs 250 N, yet the left support pushes up with only 100 N while the right pushes with 150 N. The plank looks symmetrical — so why does one end carry half again as much as the other?

02

Explore

Complete previous stage
03

Formalize

Complete previous stage
04

Practice

Complete previous stage
05

Challenge

Complete previous stage
Spoilers

Moments & Equilibrium: the Non-Uniform Beam — summary and key formula

ShowHide

The question

A 4 m plank rests on two supports. It weighs 250 N, yet the left support pushes up with only 100 N while the right pushes with 150 N. The plank looks symmetrical — so why does one end carry half again as much as the other?

Because the plank is NON-uniform: its centre of gravity is not in the middle. The two supports share the weight, but they share it unequally — and the split tells you exactly where the heavy part hides. Master moments and you can locate that hidden weight without ever cutting the beam open.

The key idea

A rigid body is in equilibrium only when TWO conditions hold simultaneously. (1) Forces balance: the total upward force equals the total downward force, ΣF = 0. (2) Moments balance: about ANY point, the total clockwise moment equals the total anticlockwise moment, Στ = 0. A moment (turning effect) is the force multiplied by the perpendicular distance from the pivot to the force's line of action. Because a force acting through the pivot has zero perpendicular distance, taking moments about a support eliminates that support's reaction from the equation — the standard way to solve for an unknown reaction or an unknown distance.

A beam on two supports is held by two upward reactions, RAR_ARA​ and RBR_BRB​, against its weight WWW acting down at the centre of gravity. **Step 1 — forces:** RA+RB=WR_A + R_B = WRA​+RB​=W. The supports split the weight, but they split it according to how close the CoG is to each: the nearer support carries more. **Step 2 — moments:** choose a pivot and set clockwise = anticlockwise. Pivot at A and RAR_ARA​ contributes nothing (its line of action passes through A), so RB×(distance to B)=W×(distance to CoG)R_B\times(\text{distance to }B) = W\times(\text{distance to CoG})RB​×(distance to B)=W×(distance to CoG) — one equation, one unknown. **Why a NON-uniform beam matters:** if the beam were uniform the CoG would sit at its geometric centre and the maths would already be set; for a non-uniform beam the CoG is hidden, and the unequal reactions are exactly what locate it. **The zero-reaction condition:** loading the beam so that RA=0R_A = 0RA​=0 means support A pushes with no force — every newton of upward support now comes from B, and the beam is on the verge of tipping about B. Take moments about B and the load on one side must balance the weight on the other. **Connect it:** this is the seesaw you balanced as a child — heavier child sits closer to the pivot — written as an equation. Same physics scales a child's seesaw, a diving board, and the deck of a bridge.

The formula

τ=F d∑F=0,∑τcw=∑τacw\tau = F\,d \qquad \sum F = 0,\quad \sum \tau_{\text{cw}} = \sum \tau_{\text{acw}}τ=Fd∑F=0,∑τcw​=∑τacw​
  • ·moment (N·m) = force F (N) × perpendicular distance d (m) from the pivot to the force's line of action. For equilibrium you write two equations: vertical forces up = forces down (gives one reaction once the other is known)
  • ·and clockwise moments = anticlockwise moments about a chosen pivot. Pivot at a support and that support's reaction drops out
  • ·leaving a single unknown to solve.

Common mistake

Assuming the centre of gravity of a NON-uniform beam sits at its geometric centre — it does not, which is the whole point of the problem. The other classic slip is dropping a distance or a sign when taking moments: always measure each perpendicular distance from your chosen pivot and keep clockwise and anticlockwise moments on opposite sides of the equation.

What to remember

  • ·Equilibrium needs BOTH conditions: forces balance (up = down, ΣF = 0) and moments balance (clockwise = anticlockwise about any point, Στ = 0).
  • ·Moment = force × perpendicular distance; a force acting at the pivot has zero moment, so taking moments about a support eliminates that support's reaction.
  • ·A non-uniform beam's centre of gravity is NOT at its midpoint — the unequal reactions locate it; driving one reaction to zero means the other support carries the entire load.